<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Canon EF 50mm f/1.8 II Lens</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.photogearuser.com/81/canon-ef-50mm-f18-ii-lens/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.photogearuser.com/81/canon-ef-50mm-f18-ii-lens</link>
	<description>Real Photography Gear Reviews by Real Photographers</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 11:59:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: CarlM</title>
		<link>http://www.photogearuser.com/81/canon-ef-50mm-f18-ii-lens/comment-page-1#comment-15</link>
		<dc:creator>CarlM</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Oct 2008 23:07:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.photogearuser.com/?p=81#comment-15</guid>
		<description>Any way you look at it, this is one cracking lens for the money.  Compared to my 18-55mm kit zoom lens, the photographs from this are so much clearer.

Sure it&#039;s a cheap lens - I mean it&#039;s cheaply built - but at less than £70 it would be wrong to expect anything more.  I get the feeling that the money has gone towards the optics rather than the construction.

I&#039;ve no problems with the autofocus.  It&#039;s speedy enough and the images are pretty sharp.

This lens might not last me forever, but I&#039;m sure I&#039;ll get more than my money worth out of it!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Any way you look at it, this is one cracking lens for the money.  Compared to my 18-55mm kit zoom lens, the photographs from this are so much clearer.</p>
<p>Sure it&#8217;s a cheap lens &#8211; I mean it&#8217;s cheaply built &#8211; but at less than £70 it would be wrong to expect anything more.  I get the feeling that the money has gone towards the optics rather than the construction.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve no problems with the autofocus.  It&#8217;s speedy enough and the images are pretty sharp.</p>
<p>This lens might not last me forever, but I&#8217;m sure I&#8217;ll get more than my money worth out of it!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
